E. Robert Schulman , C. Virginia Cox , and E. Anne Schulman
Alexandria, Virginia
Abstract
The stacking properties of toroids that reflect radiation in
the 1.8 to 2.8 eV energy range is investigated. Preliminary
results indicate that in the optimal configuration the toroids
are oriented vertically with those reflecting lower energy
photons having larger gravitational potential energies for
toroids of equal mass. The ambiguousness of this solution is
tested by experiments performed by a relatively inexperienced
researcher (t= 0.9167 yr). These experiments indicate that
alternate solutions can be found.
1. Introduction
The significance of toroidal stacking properties in
the present society should not be underestimated. A plurality of
localities in which dwell immature Homo sapiens contain
educational implements consisting of conic surfaces that can be
combined with multiple toroids to produce coherent structures. The
number of toroids per conic surface is usually five, and there
is often an anticorrelation between toroidal radius and the mean energy
of
photons reflected by each torus.
In this paper, we report on the results of a study
of toroidal stacking properties by independent groups. Two of us (ERS
and CVC) are experienced researchers, while one of us (EAS) is a
relatively inexperienced researcher, having an age of 0.9167 yr at the
time the study was performed.
2. Description of Experimental Apparatus
The experimental apparatus consists of six
components: A solid with a circular base and a plane curve tapering
uniformly towards a vertex, which has a mean reflected photon energy of
2.18 eV, and five
toroids of different radii having mean reflected photon energies of
2.76,
2.43, 2.18, 1.97, and 1.80 eV. The experimental aparatus is shown in Figure 1 :
3. Description of Experiment 1
In the first experiment, two of us (ERS and CVC)
together attempted to determine the optimal toroidal stacking
configuration. It was found that in the most advantageous mode the
toroids are arranged in a vertical orientation with those reflecting
lower energy photons having larger gravitational potential energies for
toroids of equal mass. This solution is listed in column
2 of Table 1.
4. Description of Experiment 2
In the second experiment, one of us (EAS)
independently attempted to determine the optimal stacking
configuration. A large number of acceptable solutions were found,
although interestingly these did not
include the solution described in section 3. Columns 3 to 8 of Table 1
list
six solutions that were found using this method:
Table 1. Toroidal Stacking Solutions
Solution Number
1 2a
2b 2c
2d 2e 2f
Level
6
2.18 2.43 1.80
2.43 1.97 1.80
Level 5
1.80 1.97 1.80
2.43 1.80 1.80
2.18
Level 4
1.97
1.97
1.97
1.97
Level 3
2.18 2.76 2.18
2.18
Level 2
2.43
2.43
2.43 2.43
Level 1
2.76
2.76
2.76
5. Discussion
Although the experienced researchers consistently
found only one optimal toroidal stacking solution, the relatively
inexperienced researcher found a multiplicity of acceptable solutions.
These results can be understood in the context of a model that predicts
a strong correlation between acceptance of the current scientific
paradigm and research experience.
The verisimilitude of solution one is brought into
question by its absence in the multiple trials of experiment two;
despite the abstract plausibility and possible pedagogic utility of the
concept of orienting toroids vertically with those reflecting lower
energy photons having larger gravitational potential energies for
toroids of equal mass, it is possible that this and similar concepts
limit the phase space explorations of experienced researchers.
6. Conclusions
The stacking properties of toroids that reflect
radiation in the 1.8 to 2.8 eV range was investigated. Preliminary
results indicated that in the optimal configuration the toroids are
oriented vertically with those reflecting lower energy photons having
larger gravitational potential energies for toroids of equal mass.
The ambiguousness of this solution was tested by
experiments performed by a relatively inexperienced researcher (t=
0.9167 yr), which indicated
that alternate solutions can be found. In fact, the inexperienced
researcher
failed to find the original solution, suggesting that the phase space
explorations
of the experienced researchers were limited by their adherence to the
currently
accepted scientific paradigm.
An English translation of this report is also available.